More clarity needed for rural markets post-Brexit

News Desk
Authored by News Desk
Posted: Thursday, August 24, 2017 - 07:36

Transaction based price index slips for a third successive report Headline demand continues to decline but conditions vary depending on land quality Twelve-month price expectations still negative but only modestly in the South West.

Subdued demand for farmland coupled with falling land prices and a lack of new supply across the rural sector sees calls for more post-Brexit clarity from respondents to the RICS/RAU Rural Land Market Survey H1 2017.

The H1 survey shows demand for farmland continuing to soften across both mixed use and commercial sectors. This marks the fourth consecutive report in which demand has reportedly declined. This follows on from H2 2016 with respondents once again citing a lack of clarity over the post-Brexit landscape as negatively impacting the market.

Breaking it down, anecdotal evidence does suggest demand for higher quality land remains stronger in comparison, while purchasers are more selective when it comes to lower grade farmland.

Coupled with falling demand, there has been a fall in the availability of mixed use and commercial farmland for the second period in succession. Despite tightening supply conditions nationally, the recent drop-off in demand is still placing some downward pressure on prices. This half, the transaction based measure of farmland prices* edged lower for a third consecutive report to stand at £9936 per acre nationally. This measure has slipped by around 9% based on the year-on-year data across the UK. Prices in the South West declined by 2% during H1.

Looking ahead, respondents to the survey expect prices to remain in negative territory for the coming twelve months. However, while 10% more respondents anticipate prices to decline in the coming year, price expectations have become less pessimistic.

Most purchases continue to made by individual farmers across the UK, with just under a quarter of purchases being made by ‘lifestyle’ buyers. Investments from agricultural businesses and institutional investors both accounted for just under 10%.

Charles Lucas FRICS of Humberts in Marlborough, commented on the South West: “With the uncertainty following the general election result and on the outcome of Brexit negotiations there is a certain amount of caution around which has seen a decline in non-farmer interest.”

Jason Beedell, Partner at Strutt & Parker LLP, commented: “Farmland prices have fallen from their peak in late 2014 /early 2015 due to weaker demand from farmers, who are the main buyers of farmland.  However, the average hides a great variation in prices, for example from £7,000 to well over £10,000 per acre for arable land.  Prices depend on the quality of the land but also on, in many cases more significantly, whether there are acquisitive local farmers and investors, who are often looking to roll-over funds from the sale of residential development land.  Where there is strong local interest, buyers are paying similar prices to the peak; elsewhere, land is struggling to attract interest and sell. 

“Because of this, more land is being tested ‘off the market’, with neighbours or known active buyers, rather than being formally advertised and put ‘on the market’. The appointment of Michael Gove as secretary of state for environment, food and rural affairs has been generally welcomed, however the farming sector, like other industries, wants long-term stable policies which it understands and on which investment can be planned.”

Alex Lawson, MRICS Director of National Farms & Estates at Savills, commented: “Given the wider political and economic landscape, it is unsurprising that there are some concerns in the market. However, there is an inherent confidence in the sector and where quality farms and estates are priced and presented correctly, they continue to sell well. Although prices vary greatly, depending on location, calibre and whether or not there is competition.”

Tags